Thursday, March 31, 2005

Behavioral What What

From the Chronicle Review's BF Skinner Revisited

"We recognize a person's dignity or worth," writes Skinner, "when we give him credit for what he has done. The amount we give is inversely proportional to the conspicuousness of the causes of his behavior. If we do not know why a person acts as he does, we attribute his behavior to him. We try to gain additional credit for ourselves by concealing the reasons why we behave in given ways or by claiming to have acted for less powerful reasons. Any evidence that a person's behavior may be attributed to external circumstances seems to threaten his dignity or worth. We are not inclined to give a person credit for achievements which are in fact due to forces over which he has no control. We tolerate a certain amount of such evidence, as we accept without alarm some evidence that a man is not free. No one is greatly disturbed when important details of works of art and literature, political careers, and scientific discoveries are attributed to 'influences' in the lives of artists, writers, statesmen, and scientists respectively. But as an analysis of behavior adds further evidence, the achievements for which a person himself is to be given credit seem to approach zero, and both the evidence and the science which produces it are then challenged."

1 Comments:

At April 14, 2005 at 9:20 PM, Blogger Andy said...

I'm interested in the ethical ramifications of behaviourism - if we must judge people, should we best judge them by their intentions or their behaviour? I keep flip-flopping on this one. Glad to see you like 'Ada or Ardor'. Van Veen's intentions seem hopelessly romantic, but his behaviour is as loathsome as could be imagined, don'tcha think?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home